7(1/2)
“Look, I know when I turn somebody on. Okay？ You know what thought of you the first time I saw you？（我知道自己什么时候使人心动。好吗？你知道我第一次看到你的时候是什么感觉？）”
“What？（什么？）”
“I thought you looked like a dead man. I thought……beneath that professional exterior is a man who stop living. I wanted to take your heart in my hands and just pump life into it.（你像行尸走肉。看见你专业的外表下早就没有了生命。我想要把你的心捧在手上起搏让它活过来。）”
“Maybe that039;s your sense of ……of what happens to married people, that they just stop living. Maybe you are afraid of that039;s what039;ll happen if you marry Andrew.（也许这是你的感受，认为已婚人士生活平淡无趣。也许你怕嫁给Andrew也会变成那样。）”
“Just my being here has brought you back to life.（光是看到我你就活过来了。）”
“Laura, let039;s ummm……（Laura让我们……）”
“Yeah. I knew you039;d deny it. I mean, how could something like this happen to you, huh？But it did happen. I know it happened and you know it happened.（对，我知道你会否认。这种事怎么能发生在你身上？但它就是发生了，你知道我也知道。）”
“What happened, Laura？（发生什么了，Laura？）”
“Me and you, Paul. We happened. The thoughts you have before you fall asleep next to your wife happened.（我和你，Paul。我们的互相吸引发生了。你躺在妻子身边睡着前，脑海里闪过的那些念头，都发生了。）”
“I think we are out of time for today, Laura. Why don039;t we talk about this next time when you huh……when you e back？（我想我们今天的时间到了，Laura.不如等你呃……等你下次来我们再讨论这件事。）”
《In treatment》是精神分析和心理动力领域的经典剧集之一，没有几个心理学专业的学生没有看过。
其实不用把它翻出来复看，我闭着眼睛都能讲得出来，Laura案例是边缘型来访者色情化移情的教科书级别案例——一个即将与男友订婚，却突然情绪崩溃、放纵身体的女人，进了咨询室后，向咨询师Paul表白，声称自己无可救药地爱上了他，并以此为由解除了婚约，要求Paul给出回应，随后的咨询中Laura不断见诸行动，穿着暴露、提前到达咨询室、试图侵入Paul的私人生活等。而这个案例里的Paul并非完美权威，面对年轻性感的Laura，身陷中年危机，对妻子不满、对职业倦怠的咨询师陷入了深重的正向反移情。
我当然不是来照本宣科的。
将收件人选为易镇溢，我一个字一个字在正文里写下：
《探究咨询环境下情感表达的过度病理性归因——以〈In treatment〉Laura案为例》
传统精神分析倾向于将来访者在治疗室中的情感表达简单归结为“色情化移情”与“边缘型人格特质”，这种将来访者主体经验粗暴病理化的做法，结构性忽视了来访者真实情感表达的正当性和合理性。
Laura在治疗室中展现出的情感是炽热、真实且充满主体性的。当Laura勇敢地打
“What？（什么？）”
“I thought you looked like a dead man. I thought……beneath that professional exterior is a man who stop living. I wanted to take your heart in my hands and just pump life into it.（你像行尸走肉。看见你专业的外表下早就没有了生命。我想要把你的心捧在手上起搏让它活过来。）”
“Maybe that039;s your sense of ……of what happens to married people, that they just stop living. Maybe you are afraid of that039;s what039;ll happen if you marry Andrew.（也许这是你的感受，认为已婚人士生活平淡无趣。也许你怕嫁给Andrew也会变成那样。）”
“Just my being here has brought you back to life.（光是看到我你就活过来了。）”
“Laura, let039;s ummm……（Laura让我们……）”
“Yeah. I knew you039;d deny it. I mean, how could something like this happen to you, huh？But it did happen. I know it happened and you know it happened.（对，我知道你会否认。这种事怎么能发生在你身上？但它就是发生了，你知道我也知道。）”
“What happened, Laura？（发生什么了，Laura？）”
“Me and you, Paul. We happened. The thoughts you have before you fall asleep next to your wife happened.（我和你，Paul。我们的互相吸引发生了。你躺在妻子身边睡着前，脑海里闪过的那些念头，都发生了。）”
“I think we are out of time for today, Laura. Why don039;t we talk about this next time when you huh……when you e back？（我想我们今天的时间到了，Laura.不如等你呃……等你下次来我们再讨论这件事。）”
《In treatment》是精神分析和心理动力领域的经典剧集之一，没有几个心理学专业的学生没有看过。
其实不用把它翻出来复看，我闭着眼睛都能讲得出来，Laura案例是边缘型来访者色情化移情的教科书级别案例——一个即将与男友订婚，却突然情绪崩溃、放纵身体的女人，进了咨询室后，向咨询师Paul表白，声称自己无可救药地爱上了他，并以此为由解除了婚约，要求Paul给出回应，随后的咨询中Laura不断见诸行动，穿着暴露、提前到达咨询室、试图侵入Paul的私人生活等。而这个案例里的Paul并非完美权威，面对年轻性感的Laura，身陷中年危机，对妻子不满、对职业倦怠的咨询师陷入了深重的正向反移情。
我当然不是来照本宣科的。
将收件人选为易镇溢，我一个字一个字在正文里写下：
《探究咨询环境下情感表达的过度病理性归因——以〈In treatment〉Laura案为例》
传统精神分析倾向于将来访者在治疗室中的情感表达简单归结为“色情化移情”与“边缘型人格特质”，这种将来访者主体经验粗暴病理化的做法，结构性忽视了来访者真实情感表达的正当性和合理性。
Laura在治疗室中展现出的情感是炽热、真实且充满主体性的。当Laura勇敢地打
本章未完，点击下一页继续阅读